The Real Login Page Was Part of the Scam - Microsoft
The Microsoft page was real. The story that sent you there was not. A code presented as the way to open a document could instead sign an attacker into your account.
Incident overview
Microsoft's September 22 investigation described EvilTokens, a service for device-code phishing. A deceptive request sends someone to a real Microsoft sign-in page, where completing the process can authorize the attacker's access.
Why it works
Connor uses the halo effect as a lens: one reassuring detail can influence our judgment of the whole situation. Trust in the genuine login page can spill over into trust in the separate request that brought us there.
Protective actions
- Only enter a device code from an app or device you are deliberately trying to sign in to.
- If an unexpected document asks you to copy a code into Microsoft, stop and verify through a contact method you already trust.
- Keep checking addresses and keep MFA enabled. If you approved a suspicious work sign-in, report it promptly so IT can investigate and cut off access.
Video companion
Watch the breakdown
Right website. Wrong favor.
Checking the website address is a good habit. Keep it.
The catch here is that a real login page can complete a request you should never have approved. The page's identity and the reason you were sent there are two different questions.
A device code normally helps you sign in on another device. Think of entering a TV's code on your phone. You do the login on a trusted page, and the TV gets the access. The TV does not need you to type your password into it.
Now imagine the code came from somebody else's TV. Same real website. Very different favor.
What the document story hides
In the EvilTokens flow, the code is presented as a step toward opening a document. Completing the sign-in instead authorizes the attacker's session. That access can let an attacker use the account without learning its password.
Microsoft reported disrupting the service on September 22. Its investigation also described tools for examining compromised inboxes and tailoring later scams. That is reported activity, not proof that every affected account was used in every possible way.
The halo does not cover everything
Connor connects this reassuring detail to the halo effect: an overall positive impression can influence judgments about separate qualities.
Nisbett and Wilson's 1977 experiment used a warm or cold interview with the same instructor. Students' impressions influenced ratings of his appearance, mannerisms, and accent. They were not evaluating phishing messages.
The parallel is useful, but limited. A genuine Microsoft page can reassure you about Microsoft without establishing the intentions of whoever supplied the code.
Check whose access you are approving
Only enter a device code when it comes from an app or device you deliberately started signing in to. A surprise document email is not that situation.
If the request is unexpected, stop and ask the sender using an existing phone number or another trusted channel. Do not ask the suspicious message to vouch for itself.
Already completed a suspicious work-account sign-in? Tell IT promptly. They may need to revoke sessions and investigate other changes, not just reset a password.
Keep MFA enabled. This is a reason to check what you are approving, not a reason to throw away a useful protection.
What changed, and what remains uncertain?
Microsoft's disruption targets this service. It does not make device-code phishing disappear. Reported compromised inboxes are not a count of organizations fully taken over, and the research does not establish any one victim's motives.
This page is an article adaptation of Connor's September 23 video, not a verbatim transcript. Sources were checked September 26, 2026.
Sources
- Unmasking EvilTokens: Getting to the root of device code phishing (opens in a new tab)
Microsoft Threat Intelligence
- The Real Login Page Was Part of the Scam - Microsoft (opens in a new tab)
CyberPsych with Connor · September 23, 2026
Supports: Published title, date, captions, and framing. This page is a sourced article adaptation, not a verbatim transcript.
- The halo effect: Evidence for unconscious alteration of judgments (opens in a new tab)
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
Supports: Nisbett and Wilson (1977). Participants saw a warm or cold interview with the same instructor, not identical footage and not a phishing experiment.
- OAuth 2.0 device authorization grant (opens in a new tab)
Microsoft Learn
Related cases
Video breakdownIt Blocked Ads... and Shared Your Account Access - Twitch
The Twitch extension really did make streams better. That did not answer a separate question: what was it doing with users' account access? A useful feature and a security problem can exist at the same time.
Video breakdownProve You're Human... Install This Malware - ClickFix
A familiar website check turns into a request to run a computer command. The trick depends on you treating a very different task like the same old interruption. You do not need to know code to know where to stop.
